Posted by Jenny on February 19, 2002 at 10:36:08:
In Reply to: Here we go ... posted by Jim Miller on February 19, 2002 at 10:01:25:
I think that would get tacky dividing Kittanning up like that into different themes. It's really not big enough to do that. I liked someone's suggestion about a native american thing, I think that would be appropriate considering the town was named after the Kit-Han-E (sp?) Indians.
> Touche on the consistancy issue .. that WOULD need to be worked on ..
> The only defenseor way to incorporate all the era's of our heritage MIGHT
> be to do maybe something like Kennywood, Disney and other theme parks
> do .. have different areas based on different themes .. several blocks of
> a certain street are CRUISE-VILLE .. another street/few blocks are NATIVE
> COUNTRY .. another is CRAFT-HOLLOW .. etc .. diverse themes would draw
> varied crowds and cross demographics .. wouldn't corner ourselves into any
> one market ..
> But would that lend itself to the appearance of a tacky kinda jigsaw
> puzzle ?? .. or can the common economic goal and proper zoning/planning
> hold all those areas together in more of a quilt than a disjoint puzzle ??
> Hmmmmm ... ??? wonders the typist ...