Re: SECTION 8.....Quick show of hands for or against


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Kittanning Message Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Had E. Nuff on March 01, 2005 at 21:23:36 (PST):

In Reply to: Re: SECTION 8.....Quick show of hands for or against posted by Charlie on March 01, 2005 at 19:20:14 (PST):

: : : : : : : : simply vote "for" or "agaist"

: : : : : : : FOR....check your spelling on against.....

: : : : : :
: : : : : : Here's your "n"...spelling nazi.

: : : : : "FOR"

: : : : I'm FOR....Sam
: : : ////////////////What exactly is "Section 8" ??

: : It's a program that has been around for a number of years, It helps low income people with their rent. It's based on their income. This also helps the elderly and the disabled. It allows the people to reside in normal rental properties instead of having to live in high rises or the projects. There are only something like 200-300 families helped every year, because of the funding from the federal govt., for Armstrong Co., hope this helps you with your question./////////////If that's the case,I'm 100% for it!!

What this person doesn't mention is the abuse of the system. For most it doesn't "help" pay thier rent, it pays it all. If all it did were what this person said I'd be for it to, but that's not the case. What it does, in MANY instances, is give lowlifes a free place to live payed for by the tax dollar. In turn for this these people tend to run the properties into ruin, then move on to the next one. All along letting other people who wouldn't qualify on thier own live with them. Since these people all have a free home (and most likely everything else) paid for them by the tax dollar, there is absolutely no reason for them to try and better thier situation.




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Robot filter: Copy:
Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Kittanning Message Board ] [ FAQ ]